🔗 Share this article

According to a fresh review, scores of people with experience in the petroleum industry have been positioned within the existing administration, comprising more than 40 who formerly been employed directly for coal firms.

Context of the Report

This report analyzed the profiles of appointees and personnel positioned in the White House and eight national offices overseeing energy matters. These include major entities like the EPA, the Department of the Interior, and the energy office.

Broader Policy Environment

The report surfaces during ongoing efforts to dismantle environmental policies and alternative energy incentives. For example, recent legislation have unlocked extensive areas of government property for drilling and phased out backing for clean power.

With the firehose of negative things that have happened on the climate arena... it’s vital to educate the people that these aren’t just measures from the vague, huge thing that is the government writ large, said one analyst engaged in the report. They are frequently specific players coming from specific powerful groups that are implementing this damaging pro-industry program.

Key Results

Authors identified 111 staff whom they classified as energy sector veterans and alternative energy adversaries. That covers 43 individuals who were previously working by oil firms. Included in them are prominent top executives including the top energy official, who earlier served as CEO of a oil extraction company.

This group additionally features less prominent government personnel. For example, the office handling energy efficiency is led by a former oil manager. In the same vein, a senior energy advisor in the White House has served in top-level roles at prominent energy corporations.

Further Connections

An additional 12 officials were found to have links to industry-backed libertarian thinktanks. These encompass ex- members and researchers of groups that have strongly fought clean power and promoted the expansion of conventional sources.

Additionally 29 additional staff are former industry executives from manufacturing industries whose activities are directly tied to energy resources. Other personnel have connections with power companies that distribute fossil fuels or public officials who have supported pro-coal policies.

Agency Concentration

Analysts identified that 32 employees at the Department of the Interior by themselves have ties to fossil fuel energy, establishing it as the most heavily affected federal department. That features the head of the agency, who has long taken energy support and acted as a conduit between fossil fuel industry supporters and the administration.

Political Finance

Fossil fuel contributors contributed sizable resources to the presidential effort and ceremony. After assuming power, the leadership has not only implemented industry-friendly regulations but also created incentives and exceptions that advantage the sector.

Experience Questions

In addition to energy-connected nominees, the analysts noted a number of administration leaders who were appointed to powerful positions with little or no relevant expertise.

These individuals may not be connected to fossil fuels so explicitly, but their inexperience is concerning, said one researcher. It is plausible to think they will be compliant, or vulnerable targets, for the oil industry’s plans.

For instance, the candidate to lead the EPA’s department of legal affairs has limited legal background, having not ever tried a case to resolution, nor conducted a deposition, and not argued a court petition.

In another example, a executive assistant dealing on energy policy came to the role after being employed in positions disconnected to the sector, with no apparent specific energy industry or policy background.

White House Reaction

A representative for the White House dismissed the report, saying that the leadership’s appointees are extremely capable to implement on the people’s mandate to expand American resource development.

Historical and Current Environment

The leadership oversaw a substantial number of pro-industry measures during its initial term. In its current period, backed with conservative agendas, it has overseen a much broader and stricter crackdown on climate rules and renewable energy.

There is no embarrassment, commented a researcher. Officials are willing and willing to go out there and publicize the fact that they are performing favors for the energy industry, extractive industry, the mining industry.